From 959d2685714ac1d55cb7fa2cc963eb2c91bb2e3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neale Pickett <neale@woozle.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 22:06:06 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Talk about speed

---
 README.md | 7 +++++++
 h264      | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index d505d45..0e414b5 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -30,6 +30,13 @@ into a new `.mkv` file.
 Since the "copy" video codec is used in the second step,
 everything works properly.
 
+Doing things in two steps adds a little bit of time,
+but in my experience,
+the hardware transcoder is so much faster,
+the second step time isn't a problem.
+I see ffmpeg reporting running at `speed=500x` and higher
+on the second step.
+
 # Thanks
 
 Thank you to Will Usher,
diff --git a/h264 b/h264
index 74a1cb4..68b1ec4 100755
--- a/h264
+++ b/h264
@@ -126,5 +126,5 @@ for fn in "$@"; do
     -y \
     "$out"
 
-  echo rm "$intermediate"
+  rm "$intermediate"
 done