30 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
30 lines
1.1 KiB
Markdown
|
Title: Making "Monopoly" suck less
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
These are simple alternative rules for Monopoly which make the game
|
||
|
|
more balanced and, as a result, more exciting and less hurtful. No
|
||
|
|
longer does every player know who will win after a few passes of "Go":
|
||
|
|
it's anybody's game right up to the end. Strategy becomes more
|
||
|
|
important than luck.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Rules to make Monopoly more fun
|
||
|
|
-------------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Anyone who owns a property can begin building on it without needing
|
||
|
|
a Monopoly.
|
||
|
|
2. To build, you must pay the money to the bank, and then roll above
|
||
|
|
8 on the dice.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Granted this takes the monopoly aspect out of "Monopoly", but who
|
||
|
|
cares if it allows you to again enjoy the board game you purchased?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Questions I've been asked
|
||
|
|
-------------------------
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* Can you hand over property that's built on?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
It's up to you. Since there's no rent advantage to obtaining a
|
||
|
|
monopoly (unless there are no houses on a property, in which case
|
||
|
|
rent doubles), there's much less incintive to engage in the sorts of
|
||
|
|
unbalanced trades one typically finds oneself making to stay in the
|
||
|
|
game.
|