Comment on weird section
This commit is contained in:
parent
39f3fe3de7
commit
80d24b1011
|
@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ There are a few points to note here:
|
||||||
* 1st place is a *huge deal*. Disproportionately huge.
|
* 1st place is a *huge deal*. Disproportionately huge.
|
||||||
* Places 2-10 are similarly big deals compared to places 3-11.
|
* Places 2-10 are similarly big deals compared to places 3-11.
|
||||||
* Places 12-50 operate the way most people probably assume ranking works: linearly.
|
* Places 12-50 operate the way most people probably assume ranking works: linearly.
|
||||||
* Places 51-60 are a second degree polynomial, but it doesn't matter much for so few points.
|
* Places 51-60 fit best to a second degree polynomial, but it doesn't matter much for differences of hundreths of a point. This section is *really weird*, mathematically.
|
||||||
* Places 61-100 are all less than 1 point. If you're a judge trying to tank a top dancer, anywhere in this range is equivalent to anywhere else.
|
* Places 61-100 are all less than 1 point. If you're a judge trying to tank a top dancer, anywhere in this range is equivalent to anywhere else.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue