Compare commits

...

5 Commits

6 changed files with 287 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
---
title: My Take on CLRG's Cheating Scandal
date: 2022-10-05
---
This was originally part of my
[technical analysis / explainer](2022-10-04-CLRG-cheating.html)
post,
but I've moved it here because it's just opinion.
---
Trees grow up *and* down. The part of the tree you can see is only half of the
organism: for every meter of Siberian Elm tree I can cut down, there's a meter
of Siberian Elm tree I need to dig out, and digging is way more work than
cutting.
I suspect that this racket is deep-rooted and widespread. I imagine the most
likely outcome will be a lot of social media posts, some funny T shirts, a few
resignations, maybe some people getting banned from events, and that's about it.
The only adjudicator this document proves is corrupt is the whisleblower who
sent in the screen shots. Even people named in these messages stand a decent
chance of escaping consequences, if they play their cards right.
Don't forget that you need a lot of certified adjudicators for things to run at
their current scale. They can't just fire everybody and start over: they need
their current instructors to train up new ones. And if this document is
representative, half of their current instructor pool is already compromised.
There's no way to ensure this scheme won't be a part of the new adjudicator
training.
Somebody is going to have to deliver a candid presentation to the board, or
whatever they have, about the reality here. The corruption is probably so deep
that they won't be able to take any significant action without destroying the
whole organization. And this is just going to embolden the bad actors.
After time passes, the presure from some of these intense and monied parents
I've met will resume, and everything will be back to the way it was before.
Sure, there will be some casting changes, but the system that's been built up
for years--possibly decades--is going to persist long after the furore dies
down.
We may, however, see a renewed interest in some of the smaller Irish Dance
organizations like CRN, who already seems to be making some moves.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
---
title: Iceland trip
date: 2023-01-06
---
We went to Iceland for two weeks over the winter break.
I couldn't think of anything I wanted to write in this blog about it,
but someone on somethingawful just asked me for some tips,
and my reply seems kinda interesting,
so here it is:
---
> Hey, really random, but saw you mention in the EV thread you just got back
> from Iceland, got any winter travel tips? I'm going in a few weeks, and I
> think pretty much everything I've read is focused on visiting in the summer.
I overpacked because I wasn't sure what to expect, but I didn't overpack by
much. I brought:
* A pair of insulated water-resistant pants (lined with fleece I think, sort of
like ski pants). Wore them everywhere.
* Two pairs of wool socks
* Waterproof boots: mine were Danner, my wife had Sorel
* two long-sleeved wool t-shirts
* two wool sweaters
* A waterproof parka with a hood
* A wool hat
* Warm waterproof gloves with the thing so you can still use the phone
touchscreen (this was so great to have)
I had planned to buy one of those Icelandic wool sweaters when I landed, which I
did, so I could have done without the second sweater I brought. The Icelandic
one was crazy warm: I found myself stripping off the coat and sometimes the
sweater while driving, to prevent overheating.
We only did little walks, like a short one to take a photo of Sólheimjökull, a
little one through Þingvellir. And lots of walking through snow in Reykjavik and
other rural places we stayed. The stuff we packed was totally adequate. I did
use the coat's hood way more than I thought I would, and was glad to have it. El
Cheapo crampons like YakTrax would have been a good idea for Þingvellir if we'd
wanted to go further, but once we saw the sign saying "if you get stuck past
here in the winter, we won't come help you", we turned around and found another
less-icy path. We weren't prepared for glacier climbing on a nature trail.
We traveled with another family, who had the smart idea to buy food at the
grocery store and prepare meals. That saved us a ton of money and I would highly
recommend doing it. Eating out was incredibly expensive. Groceries were also
expensive but more manageable.
For driving, just know your limits. They have these pullouts on the roads,
marked with a sign and an indication of how long the pullout is. If you are even
idly considering turning around, take the pullout and have a nice calm think
through that. I wound up seeing one, thinking "hmm, maybe I should turn around",
and then doing a K-turn on the freaking highway during a whiteout blizzard.
Nothing bad happened, thank goodness, but it could have gone very badly for me,
and I wished I had just taken a couple pullouts to discuss with my wife whether
we wanted to keep going. So take those pullouts.
Snow on the road is unlike anything I've ever witnessed in the Rocky Mountains,
and when they say "difficult driving conditions" in safetravel.is, pay
attention. It's not "if you're from California you'll have a hard time with
this", it's "if you're from any other country". We quickly learned to respect
their suggestions.
Lastly, the N1 fuel pumps wanted a PIN on my credit card, which I didn't have. I
think I could have used an ATM card, but instead we just asked the other family
to buy fuel for us, and we paid them back when we got home. Maybe bring an ATM
card and know the PIN! There were other gas stations where I could use Google
Pay on my phone, or Visa's tap-pay thing, with no problems. And inside the N1, I
could also use Google Pay. It was really just the pumps at the N1 stations.
Incidentally, you should pop into an N1 if you pass by one. It's a real trip.
You can even plan to have a meal there: I saw hot bars, salad bars, frozen
yogurt bars, nice custom sandwich things...
Overall the trip was great! We especially liked the westernfjörd area. The
south, near Sólheimjökull, was super touristy and I wouldn't go there on a
subsequent trip. I'm glad we got to go, and I hope you have a great time!

View File

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
---
date: 2023-01-07
title: The Yurt
---
One day,
back in the late 1990s,
I discovered that the content filter appliance at work
had blocked woozle.org
for hosting porn.
Because I worked in the group that ran that filter,
I looked into what triggered this block.
I was pretty sure I didn't have any porn.
The offending image was called `yurt.png`.
It was a cartoon drawing of a yurt.
I told the filter it was a "false positive":
it wasn't actually porn.
That got the entire site unblocked.
I don't know why I put that image on my web server,
but the yurt has stayed on woozle.org ever since.
![A cartoon yurt](/assets/images/yurt.png)

View File

@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
---
date: 2023-01-12
tags:
- drwho
title: 'Doctor Who S04E15: Dr Who goes to Scotland'
---
I skipped some episodes in the last year.
I think there were Cybermen.
There were definitely Daleks.
## S04E15: The Highlanders (1)
Okay I guess they're in Scotland.
This is another one of those episodes where all they could recover was
a few still frames and the audio,
so this episode is basically a slideshow.
I'm finding it difficult to care about this,
although this new doctor has a funny hat,
which is cute.
A lot of people are grunting in Scottish.
And there are bagpipes.
Did I mention I'm finding it difficult to care?
I may be about to decide to skip all the Earth episodes.
And yet I'm somehow halfway through the episode already.
The plot so far appears to be that the English and Scottish are fighting.
Some dudes named Grey and Perkins appear to be trying to do something nefarious.
I guess one of the new companions is named Polly.
She's going to throw a rock at the British in an attempt to stop a hanging.
Oh, are they hanging the other companion?
I think the Doctor is pretending to be some official or other again.
Grey and Perkins show up and stop the hanging,
looks like they're scavenging prisoners.
The doctor cites some law to Grey, a Lawyer, and manages to not be hanged.
The women (Polly and a Scottish woman)
are in a cave now.
I stopped paying attention.
The women were saying it was dark.
Then somebody screamed,
and credits rolled.
I guess we're still in the "women screaming" era that Susan started.
I am trying really hard but I just don't care.
I'm sorry.
I have a lot of things I could be doing with my time right now,
and almost all of them are more interesting than this.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
---
title: Trains
date: 2023-03-07
---
This year I am trying to spend less time on airplanes,
as part of a global movement motivated by carbon emissions concerns.
Amtrak, the US national passenger rail company
(the *only* national passenge rail company in the US),
is in a really sad state right now.
They keep getting their budget cut,
and freight companies have found several innovative ways
to save money at the expense of safety and passenger rail quality.
So rail exists in the US, technically,
but it is not generally considered a desirable way to go.
Maybe that will change as people seek non-airplane methods of travel.
The place where I work will let me take rail,
but they won't reimburse more than the equivalent flight.
This has never been a problem for me:
flying has always come in more expensive than train.
On this upcoming trip, I have to stay overnight in Chicago,
because there is only one train per day on each line.
Even though the train is $315 less than the cheapest flight,
I am not allowed to apply any of that toward lodging reimbursement.
If you assume people are going to take the option that
lines up closest to their personal economic interest,
that's 2 points against the train,
both of which carry an outsized societal burden.
Point 1: Time
-------------
My time is worth something to me,
and taking 4 additional days for a work trip kinda sucks.
A lot of people will stop considering rail travel based just on this point.
There's a way to fix this,
by upgrading tracks so that passenger trains can go much faster,
and by finally addressing how the mega-long freight trains can't yeild to the passenger trains,
because there aren't stretches of side track long enough for them to do so.
(People who would know assure me that the freight companies are well aware of what they're doing to passenger rail)
This fix requires two things: a country willing to spend lots of money on passenger rail,
and the political will to do something that will make freight companies really upset.
I'm not seeing that the country is excited about any kind of infrastructure spending,
much less passenger rail.
And I'm definitely not seeing a country that wants to hurt any kind of commerce.
But maybe if more scientists are inconvenienced by rail,
the winds can shift.
Point 2: Money
--------------
Even though it costs fewer dollars for me to take the train,
my company is not set up to handle this.
The result is that I have to pay out of pocket for the hotel stays,
and I will not get reimbursed.
If taking over 3 times longer wasn't enough to dissuade people,
telling them it will also cost them $400 that won't be reimbursed
is going to make rail travel look like a bad decision.
The fix for this is easier:
my company needs to figure out a way to consider that the train is saving them money,
and allow me to spend some of that savings on the required hotel.
I've started trying to see what I can do to make that happen.
It may take a few years, and depends on senior management caring,
but I think it has a higher chance of happening.
If enough places figure out how to stope penalizing people for taking the cheaper option,
maybe there will be sufficient public interest in point 1 for something to happen there.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
---
title: Universal Date Format
date: 2023-03-14
---
YYYY🌍MM🌙DD
If we use this, we won't have to re-do date formats again when we colonize another planet.
Posting here to bolster any future claim that I thought of this first.